Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 4621 - 4640 of 31,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Greene felt that a federal lawsuit (LaShawn A. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 2:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Current Issue: Volume 9, Issue 1 (2020) Articles PDF ANOTHER INAPPROPRIATE F WORD: FIDUCIARY DOCTRINE AND THE CROWN-INDIGENOUS RELATIONSHIP IN CANADABryan Birtles PDF “ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE”: NAVAJO NATION V. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 8:03 am by Eric Goldman
” Is this because FOSTA reduced child sex trafficking? [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Alvarado v Castanos, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 896487 (11th Cir., 2020) Karen Berenguela-Alvarado sought the return of her daughter—EICB—to Chile from Florida, where she was currently living with her father, Eric Castanos. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
” The place where a child is at home, at the time of removal or retention, ranks as the child’s habitual residence. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Castro v Rentieria, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 4814137 (9th Cir., 2020) the district court denied Carmen Flores Castro’s petition for the return to Mexico of Z.F.M.Z., a ten-year-old child who was Carmen’s paternal half-sister. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Once this standard is identified, a court need only apply that standard to determine if a child was at home in the country from which the child was removed. [read post]