Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 4621 - 4640 of 8,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 6:06 am by Jon Gelman
Superior A.D.), NJ Supreme Court denied certification, 907 A.2d 1014, Sept. 8, 2006.The Court reasoned that the petition for review was, “….much to do about nothing. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
It is also a fundamental tenet that copyright does not protect all copying from a work. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Real Party in Interest) (Supreme Court Case No. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:26 pm by Guest Blogger
The Supreme Court of Canada’s much-anticipated decision in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford (Bedford) represents an important victory for sex workers’ rights. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:38 am by Maya Angenot
It seems that the Federal Court has essentially rejected any use of internet encyclopedia evidence in court (see also Karachian v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:31 am
Death of parent having custody; reversion of custody to surviving parent; appointment of guardian by superior court; removalIn case of the death of the parent to whom the care and custody of the minor children shall have been awarded by the Superior Court, or in the case of the death of the parent in whose custody the children actually are, when the parents have been living separate and no award as to the custody of such children has been made, the care and… [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Frye standard of review of novel expert testimony was reaffirmed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the following two recent decisions.Snizavich v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Frye standard of review of novel expert testimony was reaffirmed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the following two recent decisions.Snizavich v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:32 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Tyler Court of Appeals addressed this issue in a 2007 opinion styled, Canal Insurance v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The appellate court held that probable cause does not require law enforcement `to show that the operator was in fact under the influence’; Arizona v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The appellate court held that probable cause does not require law enforcement `to show that the operator was in fact under the influence'; Arizona v. [read post]