Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 6,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Paragraph 46 of Circular 1/06 states that in such circumstances local planning authorities are expected to give substantial weight to the unmet need in considering whether temporary planning permission is justified. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Paragraph 46 of Circular 1/06 states that in such circumstances local planning authorities are expected to give substantial weight to the unmet need in considering whether temporary planning permission is justified. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2010). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:03 am
July 1, 2011) New Jersey's cell phone driving statute suffered a serious blow at the hands of the New Jersey appeals court, which held that the statute does not prohibit a driver from "activating" or "dialing" a cell phone equipped with a hands-free device. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
In this case the Court found that two years after the complaint was filed was a reasonable deadline because documents generated after that date were not likely to be reliable indicators of the meaning of the agreement at issue. (2) Court of Chancery Rule 33(d) requires a party to “specify” the records where the answer to an interrogatory may be obtained, which means that one does not comply with the rule by simply referring generally, as the party in this case did, to:… [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:07 pm
§ 51-4-1 et seq., must be strictly interpreted and not extended beyond its plain meaning and explicit terms. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 1:01 am
§ 207(a)(1). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:21 am
. ($200 a month plus $150 per Court Appearance.) 1) This is a Defamation case that was filed only a couple of months ago; it is brand new. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:08 am
It just does not make front page when we screw up. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, 2010 SLT 1125, [2010] 1 WLR 2601,in Scotland at least, was significant. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
Marshall[1] that the congressional grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy courts to issue final judgments on counterclaims to proofs of claim was unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
Marshall[1] that the congressional grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy courts to issue final judgments on counterclaims to proofs of claim was unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
L Rev 1, 2 (2002)]. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
L Rev 1, 2 (2002)]. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
The Long Branch Municipal Court is located at 279 Broadway # 1, Long Branch, NJ 07740-6961. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
How does this affect our business? [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 7:35 pm
Late last night, the New York state Senate voted 33-29 in favor of A8354, the bill passed earlier this month by the state Assembly legalizing same-sex marriage. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:44 pm
The Court’s 33-page opinion begins as follows: We all have bad days. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Superior Court (2004) 33 Cal.4th 407, 415-416 (2004), citing Foxgate v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 39 (1957) (plurality opinion). [read post]
