Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) (20 December 2011), in the Technology and Construction court, an applicant successfully invoked her right to privacy under Article 8, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and was granted an interim injunction to prevent transmission, storage and indexing of any part or parts of certain photographic images taken from the phone, and an anonymity order under CPR r.39.2(4), as explained by Rosalind English here. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
Second, the Supreme Court will in the near future decide a case on the subject of compensation for miscarriage of justice in the case of R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
Here I explore Hak v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
In the Article 8 defence English case law, the Supreme Court seemed pretty clear on the point, at least as a ‘general rule’, at para 61 of Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
Having fundamentally misunderstood the nature of invention, the United States Supreme Court has dealt a potentially disastrous blow to personalized medicine in its decision in Mayo v Prometheus, which invalidated Prometheus’s claim to a diagnostic correlation. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 11:49 am
In elementary school, most children in the United States spend hours in grammar lessons learning the ins and outs of writing the English language. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:37 am
" Thus, for instance, U.S. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 1:40 am
The position was the same at common law in the United States. [read post]
Shoulda Woulda? Alberta Court of Appeal Considers the Mental Element of the Tort of Civil Conspiracy
19 Apr 2012, 4:44 am
The English Court of Appeal recently did just that in Baldwin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
English, 18-292 Issue: Whether a federal prisoner may file a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
Commonwealth, 4 Va. 447, 449 (1824); State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
The position might be different elsewhere (for example France), but that was down to differences in laws and procedures which were not subject to harmonisation, and no reason for English law not to go its own way. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
