Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 7,368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
234/06 P Il Ponte Finanziaria v OHIM -- and here it is again. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Dissenting on Rubin, Lord Clarke stated that allowing the enforcement of avoidance proceedings was in keeping with the principle of modified universalism requiring the English Courts, so far as is consistent with justice and UK public policy, to co-operate with the courts in the country of the principal liquidation to ensure that a company’s assets are distributed to the creditors under a single system. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:55 am
United States and Alberts v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:29 am
In Mapp v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:19 am
" The North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled in Huang v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:06 am
In Ace European Ltd & 5 ors v (1) Howden Group (2) Howden North America Inc (formerly Howden Buffalo Inc) [2012] EWHC 2427 (Comm), Mr Justice Field upheld his prior order granting permission to the claimant insurers (the Claimants), to serve proceedings seeking declaratory relief, out of the jurisdiction.The Claimants were excess public and products liability insurers of the first Defendant and its subsidiary companies from 1995 to 2002. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 5:42 pm
” In Roman and early English law, a bond might be payable in full, no matter what damages the obligee might really suffer. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am
State-owned enterprises are subject to an additional layer of review in Canada under Investment Canada’s SOE Guidelines that set out additional factors (relating to the corporate governance and commercial orientation of the SOE) in addition to the general net benefit to Canada factors in section 20 of the ICA. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 1:06 pm
However, Apple v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:49 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm
____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences § 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] Return capslock a s d f g h j k l ; ‘ \ shift ` z x c v b n m , . / shift English Deutsch Español Français Italiano … [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:40 am
" Robinson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:13 am
Randell QC stated that it was common ground that the burden of proof was on St Andrew's to show that Smyth's partner had deliberately started the fire. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
AND OTHERS v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:45 am
Attorneys representing “commercial paleontologist” Eric Prokopi filed a motion to dismiss last Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:19 pm
The latter was the holding in the peyote case (Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 8:54 pm
For example, in Reliance Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
