Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 4621 - 4640 of 27,353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2009, 10:36 am by Mark Alpert
    But that may be coming to an end with the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Sonoma County Park Associates v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Jay J considered the law on this sub-issue to be correctly stated as being: “…a defence of fair comment would fail if the defendant omitted from the statement of facts on which the comment purported to be based some important fact that would falsify or alter the complexion of the facts that are stated” [127]. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:54 am by Antonio Dempsey
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently made a significant decision regarding the certification procedure for collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Ian M. Kysel
Shifting Sands: The Supreme Court’s Attack on Affirmative Action The Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He had fair warning of the nature of the proscribed conduct in advance of his commission of the offense, (People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The Supreme Court of Canada, as stated out in Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 3:50 pm
State, 749 N.E.2d 509, 515 (Ind. 2001) (affirming earlier decisions holding or assuming that "fundamental fairness in judicial proceedings is assumed and required by our state constitution"). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm by Unknown
Johnson (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 4:35 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
A relatively recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Williams v. [read post]