Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 44,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
People of State of Ill. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:10 pm
California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927): Whitney v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:38 am
"This Rule follows the 'good neighbor' principle established in the Clean Air Act to cut pollution that spreads across the borders of 28 eastern states. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
"Terry v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
Just last term, in Timbs v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:29 pm
If there is ever good news to be found in statistics tracking the death penalty, it is this: The number of death sentences imposed in 2009 was the lowest since 1976, the year the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty with its opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:31 pm
They asked Acker to recuse himself from the Renfroe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The state points to Rumsfeld v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:29 pm
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 3:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
It was good law when handed down in 1919 and remains good law today. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:06 am
Väderstad appealed to the General Court and limited its trade marks to the goods for which they had been found to be sufficiently represented but lacked distinctiveness. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:28 pm
Robert V. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
A similar argument was used in BMG v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:17 pm
State, 19 So. 3d 1172, 1174 - 75 (Fla. 2009) (citing Wells v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:51 am
Thanks to the IPKat for pointing out Knorr-Bremse Systems for Commercial Vehicles Ltd v Haldex Brake Products GmbH [2008] EWHC 156 (Pat), a ruling of England and Wales Patents Court where judge Mr Justice Lewison stated that "There is at the least a good arguable case that, even if KBS UK are bound by the non-challenge [to patent validity] clause (which in my judgment they are not) that clause is void because it contravenes article 81 EC:". . . 48. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 6:48 am
But there is a pretty good bet that the state of Tennessee wouldn't be arguing about this case 27 years later. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:51 pm
AP is reporting that the State of Utah has made its mark in the States v Feds immigration controversy by passing a law similar to the Arizona Immigration Law with one huge exception. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:02 am
Lydia Krebs won in State v. [read post]
