Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 19,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 12:34 am
But the Court of Human Rights has accepted that there is a countervailing public interest: that public officials should enjoy public confidence, so it may be “necessary for the State to protect them from accusations that are unfounded” (see, for example, the recent case of Lavric v Romania [2014] ECHR 44; and our post here). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 12:40 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:38 am
In Carvel International v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:27 pm
Alternatively, and more sensibly, the Court may choose to revisit its previous dog sniff cases, United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:13 am
R (CLIENTEARTH) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT FOOD & RURAL AFFAIRS (2011), QBD (Admin) Mitting J, 13 December 2011, extempore so transcript not available. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:35 am
NYC's Administrative Code requires court to apply "more stringent requirements" in adjudicating civil rights law allegationsWilliams v New York City Hous. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:32 pm
" IAM's Joff Wild expressed doubts on LinkedIn over whether human rights legislation exists to enable Apple to get around an iPhone sales ban...The human rights motion must be adjudicated swiftly, so I guess we'll hear from Colombia again soon.Ericsson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:15 am
In Hankins v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am
This will not occur when contact with those third parties is, in fact, very costly in human and economic terms, or practically impossible or prohibited by law. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:51 pm
The scope of what is, for example, widespread enough to be a crime against humanity is hard to know given the current state of the law. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:00 pm
Forster & V. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
The action is filed as “United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz(Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v Telenet (Belgium).Questions about injunctions against intermediaries are also raised in… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
A final thought: at least since 1978 (Klass v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 6:36 am
But humans are emotional creatures. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 9:07 pm
The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Ground 2: No consistent with awards of the Court of Human Rights Secondly, MGN contends that the awards made the Judge were disproportionate having regard to the sums awarded by the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) for invasion of privacy rights under Article 8. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:10 am
“The Court interpreted the State Human Rights Law to hold that an employee could not be terminated for alcohol-related chronic absenteeism where (1) he had established a causal link between his alcoholism and misconduct and (2) had demonstrated that, as of the time of termination, he was rehabilitated. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2011] EWHC 2616 (Admin) – Read judgment On 13 October 2011 Mr Justice Supperstone in the High Court held that changes to rules for calculating housing benefit were lawful and in particular did not breach equality legislation. [read post]
