Search for: "In Interest of Doe" Results 4621 - 4640 of 134,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 10:12 am by C.E. Petit
Life does throw up its interesting distractions from important things like blawgging at times, like preparing a consultation client for a hearing on a complex litigation matter of a nature new to him. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:52 am by Zak Tomlinson
 For our money, it does not get much better than that. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:42 pm by Sarah Lawsky
The research work is similar to that of law professors, and, while the position does not require any teaching, there may... [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:44 am by Max Slater
However, prosecutor Justin Sher argued [CSM report] that the right to a public trial does not... [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 9:53 pm
It's quite another to do what Judge Molloy (up in Montana) does here. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:55 am
In British Columbia, anyone interested in an estate may cite the executor to refuse or accept probate. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 2:38 pm by David Firmin
  Yes, I know the math doesn’t work unless you add HB 22-1314 which is not titled as an HOA bill but does impact common interest communities (more on this below). [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 12:37 pm by davidowlaw.com
November 7, 2024 • Volume 5 Issue 294 I hope this message pays dividends…read on: READER QUESTION: If I put any stocks or bank CDs into an irrevocable Medicaid trust, how does the trustee give me the dividends or interest from the CDs? [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:43 pm by Uthman Law Office
Code, § 1170(d)(1)) Does the court’s authority to “modify the judgment” include reducing or dismissing charges? [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:23 am by Sarah Lawsky
As the commenter suggested, there does appear to have been a shift in each of these two groups over time. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:20 am by Paul Caron
The Committee has obviously been captured by special interests, who are more concerned with posturing... [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:40 pm
   They challenge that the Constitution does not grant Congress to regulate inactivity (the decision not to buy insurance). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:44 pm by Commentary:
Bad advice does the opposite, and may even enrich someone else at your expense. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:06 pm
The court stressed that a prohibition on headscarves is in line with the schools interest in maintaining its Catholic character and held that the ban on headscarves does not constitute religious discrimination because hats and similar attire are also banned. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by David J. Shestokas
Richard Nixon: Well, when the president does it that means that it is not illegal.[1]  “… if Congress won’t act soon … I will. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Mark Edwards
That raises the stakes in deciding whether Awlaki should have been arrested in 2002; it does not, of course, alter the complex legal and ethical issues that surround the decision not to arrest him. [read post]