Search for: "In re Richard A" Results 4621 - 4640 of 10,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
RICHARD BARON: You know him as an incredible lawyer, great guy, charitable fellow. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by David J. Shestokas
Richard Nixon: Well, when the president does it that means that it is not illegal.[1]  “… if Congress won’t act soon … I will. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Yesterday Richard Poynder posted to the Lib-License list about this discussion, and I felt compelled to respond, since it seems clear this is not an isolated misunderstanding that will fade away. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:54 am
However, Captain Michael Falcon of the 20th Precinct has a different perspective on the large number of pedestrian accidents and attributes much of the blame to the pedestrians themselves: “You see people, they’re not paying attention…they’re looking at their phones…You see people with babies and there’s two seconds [on the countdown clock], and they’re going…it’s mind-boggling the things that people do. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:20 am by David DePaolo
Diana prescribes a number of lifestyle changes that the players (employees) themselves should be instigating after retiring from the game: dietary changes, exercise appropriate for arthritis, and other changes that these folks need to be re-trained to do as a routine basis for their lives." [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 4:30 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The underlying criteria is the same, whether you’re a big guy or a mom and pop. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 1:59 pm by KC Johnson
” Cooney added that grand juries no longer protect the accused, but instead function by handing “out indictments like they’re boxes of popcorn. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:31 am by Ben
More on Computerworld including an interview with Re-Digi's John Ossenmacher here [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am by Michael Markarian
Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mark Kirk, R-Ill., Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., and David Vitter, R-La., and Reps. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:28 am by Ivana Kunda
In order to re-establish the correlation between substantive law and the choice of law rules, the paper identifies leading theoretical features of modern-day marriage law, including the principle of party autonomy. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:48 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
A related pressure flows from what Professor Richard Susskind argues in his book, Tomorrow's Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future, is the inevitable liberalization of legal services, whereby non-lawyers are permitted to provide services traditionally considered to constitute the practice of law. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:48 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
A related pressure flows from what Professor Richard Susskind argues in his book, Tomorrow’s Lawyers, is the inevitable liberalization of legal services, whereby non-lawyers are permitted to provide services traditionally considered to constitute the practice of law. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:48 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
A related pressure flows from what Professor Richard Susskind argues in his book, Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future, is the inevitable liberalization of legal services, whereby non-lawyers are permitted to provide services traditionally considered to constitute the practice of law. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:32 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 In particular, I've had in mind the "nudge" literature - for example, Raj Chetty's important study along with a number of others that reach similar findings, Richard Thaler's and Cass Sunstein's book on nudges, and their related article on libertarian paternalism. [read post]