Search for: "Individual Does 1-10" Results 4621 - 4640 of 14,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2020, 1:57 pm by Joanna Herzik
Update 1/27/20: We received a report of another scam. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am by DONALD SCARINCI
We further hold nothing under article II, section 1 or the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution grants to the electors absolute discretion in casting their votes and the fine does not interfere with a federal function. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:30 am by Phil Dixon
It does not require ‘demonstration by a preponderance that disclosure of the suppressed evidence would have resulted ultimately in the defendant’s acquittal. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Between January 9, 2012, and November 21, 2014, she left work at least 10 minutes or more before the end of her shift on 114 occasions and was absent seven times. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
In the District of Columbia, the top rate kicks in at $1 million, as it does in California (when the state’s “millionaire’s tax” surcharge is included). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
In the District of Columbia, the top rate kicks in at $1 million, as it does in California (when the state’s “millionaire’s tax” surcharge is included). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A024-A025) that: (1) The document contains unnecessary, sensitive material that is entitled to remain confidential; and (2) The individual's privacy interest in the information in this document overrides the public's interest in viewing the material. (3) There is no reasonable alternative to protect the individual's privacy interest. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 8:21 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For instance:  The changes in 29 CFR 4006.5(f)(3), which deal with premium proration for short plan years where the plan’s assets are distributed in a termination, are applicable to plan years beginning in or after 2020;   The changes in 29 CFR 4010.7(a)(2), § 4010.9(b)(2), and § 4010.11(a)(1)(i), which deal with identifying legal relationships of controlled group members, consolidated financial statements, and calculating the funding… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
United States [1] and restricted the Government’s ability to obtain a conviction for honest-services fraud on an “as opportunities arise” or retainer theory.[2]Under this theory, it is not enough for the Government to charge and prove, for example, that an individual paid a public official to take official action to benefit the payor as opportunities arose. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:43 pm by Quinta Jurecic
On April 10, 2018, I issued Proclamation 9723 (Maintaining Enhanced Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats), removing travel restrictions on nationals of the Republic of Chad. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am by Keith Mallinson
With his judgement vacated, Judge Selna’s analysis no longer has any legal authority; but it does reveal some of the methods and arguments that may continue to be applied in the valuation of SEPs and determination of royalties for these under FRAND terms.The wisdom of lay folkPerhaps the jurors will see through all the bluff and complexities, as they do in so many other trials. [read post]