Search for: "International Materials, Inc." Results 4621 - 4640 of 7,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
. “Identifiable” material would be treated differently from “non-identifiable” content, with the aspiration “that, over time, people will pay less attention to and take less notice of material which is anonymous”. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:21 am by Mark D. Gerstein, Latham & Watkins LLP,
Their use may be impaired, however, if an “ownership change” occurs pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
CQG, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Copyright The problem with the fifth fair use factor (Plagiarism Today) US Copyright – Decisions New York Court of Appeals to Second Circuit: Copyright owners suffered injury in New York for long arm jurisdiction: Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
International Playtex, Inc., 745 F.2d 292, 303 (4th Cir. 1984), the court concluded that certain epidemiologic studies were admissible despite criticism of the methodology used in the studies. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
International Playtex, Inc., 745 F.2d 292, 303 (4th Cir. 1984), the court concluded that certain epidemiologic studies were admissible despite criticism of the methodology used in the studies. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., “transformative use” was originally one aspect of the first factor—the character and nature of the allegedly infringing use—to be balanced with the other three factors outlined in the Copyright Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers operating in the United States should evaluate potential workforce and implications of proposed immigration law reforms The Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy Act (RAISE Act) in light of the joint announcement of plans to prioritize the proposed reforms for enactment announced jointly by RAISE Act sponsors Senators Tom Cotton and David Perdue and President Donald Trump earlier today (August 2, 2017). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
But then again, Fully automated deletion or suspension of content can be particularly effective and should be applied where the circumstances leave little doubt about the illegality of the material, e.g. in cases of material whose removal is notified by law enforcement authorities[.] [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
(EDTexweblog.com) How long do I wait for a first office action (Patently-O) Patent pendency: Reconsidering expedited examination (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions Court rules that corporate executive’s failure to inform USPTO of material information renders patent unenforceable: Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:58 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
TJX Companies, Inc., 87 USPQ2d 1411 (TTAB 2008) [precedential]. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:03 am by Philip Segal
A news search on Bloomberg turns up only GSI Group Inc., a maker of agricultural equipment. [read post]