Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 35,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2021, 1:02 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am
Brief for United States, HP Inc. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:11 am
United States, a case involving the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm
United States, a lawsuit challenging the lack of voting representation in the House of Representatives for residents of the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:12 pm
A native of Cuba, Prieto moved to the United States with his parents when he was seven years old. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
See, e.g., United Fin. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:26 am
ShareIn Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
United States when reading laws about computers. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 4:50 am
Gerger v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
