Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 21,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2020, 5:01 am
Accordingly, the court held that the defendant was liable for the interest.As I listened, I began to think more carefully about the decision to issue a decision in favor of the plaintiffs for the amount of the interest they had been required to pay.In one sense, the defendant’s statement that he was willing to pay the interest tilted the judges’ decision. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:03 pm
Moreover, an invitee cannot maintain a negligence suit merely from a showing that an injury was sustained in the defendant’s building. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:32 am
The court noted, however, that the plaintiff’s claim only asserted that the defendant committed medical malpractice, and did not include allegations that the defendant was liable for failing to obtain the plaintiff’s informed consent. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:04 am
How Could You Possibly Be Liable for a Slip and Fall? [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm
’s, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 12:30 pm
Seventh Circuit (2019): The guard violated county policy and took steps to conceal his misconduct, so while he's liable, the county is not. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:23 am
Upon review, the court granted the defendant’s motion. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:17 am
Instead, the man’s UIM insurance carrier filed a declaratory judgment action in the federal district court for the District of South Carolina, seeking to establish that it was not liable for any additional monies under the property damage provision of the plaintiff’s UIM policy, regardless of whether the man was ultimately awarded punitive damages from the drunk driver. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:16 am
Insomuch as the claimant never sought benefits from the defendant and, in fact, stated that his 2003 back injury was merely a continuation of the old one, the plaintiff’s quantum meruit claim failed, as did its equitable indemnity argument against the defendant. [read post]
22 May 2020, 11:10 am
After the defendant board of trustees announced their intent to wind down the fund and set up a new mutual insurance company, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit seeking to challenge the board’s authority to use the fund’s assets in that manner. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:06 am
Dog bite In some places such as California all owners of dogs are strictly liable for any particular injury that could be as result of their dog’s bite. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Under that fairly long-established doctrine, user companies are liable for violations committed by supplier companies only if they control or effectively determine the labor policies or practices of those entities. [read post]
21 May 2020, 5:04 pm
Without testimony from the defendant that he lost control of the vehicle because he was driving barefoot or a witness to testify to that fact, the state probably has no evidence. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:44 pm
The commissioner denied the motion and refused to recuse herself, determined that the plaintiff had 0% permanent impairment, and ruled that the defendant was only liable for future physical therapy and injections (not any other future medical care). [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:37 pm
Decision of the Court The federal district court granted the defendant’s motion. [read post]
20 May 2020, 6:59 pm
At the time of the collision, the defendant was driving a commercial vehicle for his employer, which was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:52 pm
¹⁵ Plaintiff alleged that defendant’s CEO claimed that defendant’s prices were “underpriced relative to value. [read post]
19 May 2020, 5:00 pm
In Maryland, the duty owed to a plaintiff injured on the defendant’s property is determined by the plaintiff’s legal status at the time of the incident. [read post]
19 May 2020, 12:05 pm
If the defendant meets this burden, the plaintiff must then produce evidence sufficient to rebut the defendant’s evidence. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:02 am
She filed a negligence lawsuit against the apartment complex and rental company, alleging that they were liable under Indiana’s premises liability laws. [read post]
