Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 11,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
They did in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:59 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
Judge Cacheris reconsidered his motion in light of two opinions not previously addressed in briefing: FEC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
The complaint, filed in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:52 pm
Sept. 16, 2014).IssueBoston Scientific Corporation and Scimed Life Systems, Inc. petition for permission to appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California that denied summary judgment. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
United States, 127 S. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
For the record, my opinions here track closely to my view of the convergence issue between the United States and Europe: too much deference to different theoretical priors without respectfully hashing out how those priors hold up to available evidence. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
Hoult, 373 F.3d 47, 54–55 (1st Cir.2004) (same); United States v.. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held and the United States has repeatedly urged, contrary to the decision below. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:35 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:10 pm
She's a member of the United States Attorney's Organized Crime Task Force. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague and whether a ruling to that effect would be retroactive. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Julia Raifman and Sandro Galea discuss recent research they conducted that “sheds light on how the denial of services to same-sex couples — such as decorating a wedding cake, in [Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
Home Prods., 82 S.W.3d 849, 857 (Ky. 2002) (“We are supported in rejecting prospective medical monitoring claims (in the absence of present injury) by both the United States Supreme Court and a persuasive cadre of authors from academia. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:55 am
The court found this objectivity requirement consistent with the quality control element of State v. [read post]
9 May 2025, 7:31 am
Senate to the United States Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit on May 25, 1990. [read post]
