Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 4621 - 4640 of 19,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am by John Elwood
”) If you think the order of words doesn’t matter, consider what happened to the case with nearly the same caption, King v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Brandes  titled "Navigating the Matrimonial Preliminary Conference So You Don’t Sink the Ship". appears in the New York State Bar Association Family Law Review, Winter 2020, Vol. 52, No. 1. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:15 pm by Russell Knight
But, there is much more to it or we wouldn’t be writing this article. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am by admin
Part I: The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act: Provisions Relevant to Healthcare Providers (March 31, 2020):  On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act[1] passed the House of Representatives by a voice vote. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am by Charles Sartain
The Court concluded that circumstances surrounding the transaction didn’t matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:04 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
However, under standards such as Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 5(f), 10(c), and 43(b)(2), as well as corresponding state laws, videoconferencing is only permitted in criminal proceedings if a defendant consents. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 12:12 pm by Elliot Setzer
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, March 31, 2020, at 9:30 a.m.: The Atlantic Council will host a virtual discussion of great power competition between the U.S., Russia and China. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:24 am by Phil Dixon
But a defender shouldn’t hesitate to raise the issue and proceed under one or the other, if that situation arises. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 12:51 pm by Adam Levitin
(Notice that this is different from 506(b)/Ron Pair Enterprises, where a right to post-petition interest/fees for secured claims exists no matter what the contract provides). [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:53 pm by Shannon O'Hare
Act responsibly under the circumstances in order to minimize the effects and duration of any noncompliance caused by the COVID-19 pandemic; b. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 8:30 pm by Jamie Markham
I don’t know of any clear statutory authority for a judge to do that. [read post]
” The EEOC does note that, “as a practical matter,” however, “doctors and other health care professionals may be too busy during and immediately after a pandemic outbreak to provide fitness-for-duty documentation;” Employers may screen for COVID-19 during the hiring process; Employers may delay the start date of employees with COVID-19 symptoms or positive results; and Employers may withdraw a job offer to a recently hired employee that tests positive for the… [read post]
” The EEOC does note that, “as a practical matter,” however, “doctors and other health care professionals may be too busy during and immediately after a pandemic outbreak to provide fitness-for-duty documentation;” Employers may screen for COVID-19 during the hiring process; Employers may delay the start date of employees with COVID-19 symptoms or positive results; and Employers may withdraw a job offer to a recently hired employee that tests positive for the… [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Ashley Morgan
Any small business located in any U.S. state, territory, or the District of Columbia that was operational on March 13, 2020. b. [read post]
” The EEOC does note that, “as a practical matter,” however, “doctors and other health care professionals may be too busy during and immediately after a pandemic outbreak to provide fitness-for-duty documentation;” Employers may screen for COVID-19 during the hiring process; Employers may delay the start date of employees with COVID-19 symptoms or positive results; and Employers may withdraw a job offer to a recently hired employee that tests positive for the… [read post]