Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 4621 - 4640 of 28,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm by Rick Hills
He states that "[t]he Necessary and Proper Clause cannot be utilized to 'pass laws for the accomplishment of objects' that are not within Congress’ enumerated powers (page 62). [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am by Eric Goldman
” The Zauderer test has more preconditions that the court ignores, but I guess this is what passes for Zauderer “analysis” nowadays. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
At paragraph 134, it stated that: “It will be for the Respondent state to implement . . . appropriate general and/or individual measures to fulfil its obligations to secure the rights of the applications and other persons in their position to respect for their private life. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:00 am
The city of Belmont, California passed an ordinance in November of 2007, which is becoming effective this month; the ordinance prohibits smoking in:(3) Multi-unit residence common areas; except that a landlord or common interest development may designate a portion of the outdoor area a smoking area. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 8:01 pm by Tom Smith
"After a term in which the court’s conservative majority overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:16 am
Under Chevron, the agency’s interpretation might be due some deference, but not under King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
She was stopped by police while passing through immigration control. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Pfizer and the Handling of Pass-On in Post-Trial Allocation Proceedings in Federal and State Court" by Emilio E. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
My understanding is that the ongoing litigation over the now-repealed Racial Justice Act and state and federal litigation over the state’s lethal injection protocol would continue to stand in the way of immediate executions even if the bill were to pass, but I may not be completely up to date. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. [read post]