Search for: "Paul Ames"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 5,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2009, 7:45 am
For documents, I am still stuck with MS Office, but love CutePDF for PDF creation. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 7:09 am
" This article first appeared on The Am Law Daily blog on americanlawyer.com. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:40 am
Paul Volker has urged such a policy, as have others. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
Paul Gerhardt, a Food Science Ph.D. and member of the Plum Organics action team. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 6:19 am
Ms Grahame added:“I am not sure why DCS Henderson’s statements made separately to Dutch TV and to the Crown Office contradict each other so starkly. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Greenburg also sat down with then-86 year old Justice John Paul Stevens in his first television interview, as well as Justices Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 1:15 pm
Here is a good example of what I am talking about. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 11:49 am
Paul, is a key player in whether the new building will get funded. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 5:03 am
(Am. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 9:22 am
I am still a lawyer. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
Richard Nixon, President of the United States, shaking his jowels and intoning the famous words one should never actually say, even if they're true, because the mocking will know no bounds:I'm not a crook.Now, with special thanks to Jonathan Turley and Paul Kennedy, we have the words of the estimable Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace for the 8th Ward in Louisiana's Tangipahoa Parish:I am not a racist.Of course, backing up these sorts of claims is different than… [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
For the avoidance of doubt it is correct to say that I am minded to refuse your application for funding [E] as a respondent in the Supreme Court unless the other side is prepared to:(a) Allow the cost [sic] order made in the Court of Appeal to stand in any event (b) Agree an undertaking that there will be no costs order in the Supreme Court with both sides bearing their own costs. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:03 am
I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute and for the support they have offered... [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
Gallagher’s Phil Norton, Zurich’s Paul Schiavone, and Advisen’s David Bradford. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:06 am
UPDATE: Like my co-bloggers, I am very pleased with the selection of Ostrom and Williamson. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
Other people are far better qualified to judge that issue than I am. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:55 pm
According to a paper issued by major securities law firm Paul Weiss:Waiting for the SEC to force disclosure of accounting irregularities and making misleading statements to the press during an investigation in respect to the underlying focus of the investigation...all have the potential to result, and have in fact resulted, in significant penalties.Paul Weiss specifically cited the SEC investigation of Dynegy (See page 3 and 4).Patrick Byrne's denials of wrongdoing and at the same time… [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:30 pm
Over at the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones chats with law professor Paul Secunda, of the Workplace Prof Blog, about the elements of a sexual harassment claim. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:23 am
Gallagher’s Phil Norton, Zurich’s Paul Schiavone, and Advisen’s David Bradford. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:15 pm
A Tarrant County prosecutor kicked off the commission told the paper, "I feel like a jilted lover, except that [the Governor is] prettier than I am. [read post]
