Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 4621 - 4640 of 6,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
It stands at the centre of the bosses v workers, capital v labour, rich v poor divide and is frequently pressed into service by those who have a political agenda on one side or the other. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
We are relying solely on IEEPA, an Act of Congress passed in 1977 and signed into law by the president. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] The appearance of such proposal is that of a solution to all parts of the problem, when in fact it can have no effect upon the cost of legal advice services. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm by ALeonard
He authorized the distribution to state agencies of a memorandum signed by his legal counsel, advising agencies about an appellate court opinion on marriage recognition, Martinez v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:38 am by Russell Knight
Then that law was deemed an illegal taking by the Illinois Supreme Court, Messenger v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
But when we do have both sides available to us, we present them.In the case of the People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]