Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 4621 - 4640 of 178,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2015, 2:56 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Shadur fined plaintiff $100 for failing to provide the Court a courtesy copy of its complaint as required by Local Rule 5.2(f) and the Court’s standing orders. [read post]
A recent case illustrates a slip-and-fall plaintiffs successful use of an expert witness to survive a summary judgment challenge by the defense. [read post]
The defendant’s appeal involved evidentiary challenges to the plaintiffs two expert witnesses as well as a challenge to the sufficiency of the plaintiffs claim. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 1:24 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Having said that, however, let's contemplate @chancery_daily's comment that "if we believe in the class action model, it’s critical to have people who are willing to ... serve as lead plaintiffs" — Steve Bainbridge (@PrawfBainbridge) June 1, 2023 4/ Evidence that shareholder class actions deter corporate governance abuses or fraud is, at best, mixed. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Moreover, the question of why the Plaintiff was not offered more remediation efforts was considered by the Hearing Officer, who attributed the reason to Plaintiff's resistance to such efforts. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Moreover, the question of why the Plaintiff was not offered more remediation efforts was considered by the Hearing Officer, who attributed the reason to Plaintiff's resistance to such efforts. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Lorene Park
” The plaintiffs plan to use the secret recording as evidence of discrimination backfired. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 5:05 am by Legal Profession Prof
An Illinois Hearing Board has recommended a three-year suspension with fitness for an attorney's emails in three matters. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:56 am by Legal Profession
A plaintiff's verdict in a legal malpractice case has been reversed by the Georgia Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:02 pm by Legal Profession Prof
An attorney's web page summary of a dental malpractice case in which she represented the plaintiff led to a defamation action by a defendant that was not dismissed on anti-SLAPP grounds, according to a decision of the Nevada Supreme Court... [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:16 am by Legal Profession Prof
The New Jersey Supreme Court has remanded a plaintiff's verdict in a civil case based on a report to the judge by a juror that the defendant had not placed his left hand on the Bible while taking the oath... [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:15 am by Legal Profession Prof
The New Jersey Appellate Division has, in a case of first impression, held that a plaintiff alleging that his opponent's attorney sued him for defamation with a malicious intent need not have a certificate of merit from an expert to... [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:04 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Melissa Smith
  In so holding, the Court foreclosed the argument often asserted by plaintiffs that the holding in Dukes applies only to Title VII cases. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:18 pm by Suzanne Schreck
Plaintiffs allege that food product sold by Iguana Joe’s was defective and unreasonably dangerous and that it caused their illnesses and damages. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
Stays in the cases of the other two plaintiffs had been entered by other courts and were not directly at issue.The case is procedurally unusual in that it began as a challenge to the traditional three-drug method, but the state changed to a one-drug method similar to Ohio's while the case was pending appeal.Briefly, the holdings are:1. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:17 am by Jon L. Gelman
 THE BURDEN IS ON THE DEFENSE TO CHALLENGE TPOThe plaintiff's counsel must notify the defendant that the plaintiff seeks to bring a neutral TPO to the DME. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Moreover, Judge McVerry indicated that the Tannenbaum court otherwise disapproved of the Browne court’s holding that, where benefits were paid for or earned by an insured through his employment, there should be no offset.Based upon this review of the law, Judge McVerry denied the UIM carrier’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and rejected the UIM carrier’s novel theory that, under Tannenbaum, any award to the Plaintiff for lost… [read post]