Search for: "STATE v. SCOTT" Results 4621 - 4640 of 5,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 2:00 pm by Deepak Gupta
Just before I joined the agency, for example, the Supreme Court handed down its earth-shattering decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:52 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  The states are, after all, asking the Court to ‘fashion’ doctrine for them. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
Box 308 Faribault, MN 55021-0308 Phone: (507) 332-5491 (V/TTY); (800) 657-3936 (V/TTY/Toll Free) DEAF, Inc. 413 Wacouta Street Suite 300 St. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
The court declined to retain jurisdiction of state law claims and dismissed the case, though without prejudice to a state court filing of the state law claims. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
Scott Greenfield wonders whether the news signals the end of the duopoly. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:05 pm
Any change in Riles' case or state law could have a direct effect on many Texas inmates.The Supreme Court ruling referenced is the 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am by Scott Bomboy
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:59 am by WSLL
CiteID=461771Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, Honorable Scott W. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:36 am by David Oscar Markus
The 11th Circuit's en banc decision today in Gilbert v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm by Edward Hale
The agency, however, has reclassified FDA-Approved drugs that contain less than 0.1 percent CBD as Schedule V drugs—an apparent carve out for Epidolex. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
As part of the Fall Meeting of the ABA's Section of State & Local Government Law in Tucson, on Thursday, September 22, I was on a panel discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]