Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 4621 - 4640 of 6,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm by Isabel McArdle
Sinclair Collis Limited, The Members of National Association of Cigarette Machine Operators (Interested Party) v Secretary of State for Health [2010] EWHC 3112 (Admin) – Read judgment or Rosalind English’s analysis of the decision The High Court has ruled that the Secretary of State for Health did not breach the human right to peaceful enjoyment of property or European Union law by banning the sale of tobacco products from automatic vending machines. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am by The Legal Blog
In Compuserve case (supra) again it was found that the Defendant had contacted Ohio to sell his computer software's on the Plaintiffs Ohio based systems and sent his goods to Ohio further for their ultimate sale and thus those courts had jurisdiction.47. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:44 pm by Antitrust Today
  Ever since the Second Circuit’s 1945 Alcoa opinion (United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This includes: Index on Censorship and English Pen Report on Libel Reform, “Free Speech is Not for Sale”. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Accidents: First paradigm of invention is inventor sitting around, thinking, conceiving of a compound: A+B=C, forming a complete mental picture of C. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:21 am
” Education Law §2859 Subdivision (c-1) provides for the reasonable access to employees of a charter school "If employees of the charter school are not represented, . [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm by Kelly
Nahum (IP Law Blog) District Court S D New York: Amazon isn’t liable for rogue affiliate’s keyword ad buys: Sellify v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:00 am by Javier Muñoz
http://j.mp/d1DgAh But top 100 firms don't get work via search -> El entrevistado no es, digamos, muy objetivo: 'La ley del tabaco es la más radical del mundo y fracasará' http://t.co/dg9znAF vía @el_pais -> Es fascinante cómo se cumple la Ley de Godwin en las entrevistas en la prensa tradicional. [read post]