Search for: "State v. Hands"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 31,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 6:42 am
After all, didn’t Epic Games v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:35 pm
Much less one that spans both the state and federal appellate cases. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:36 pm
The case, known as Glatt v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 7:00 pm
In an opinion that brings labor laws in a dozen states into question, the Supreme Court ruled on June 19 in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
In the recent case of DeCormier v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Cal. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:22 pm
In the case at hand, a condition to earning the stock options was employment for a specific duration. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm
In Clifton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:50 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:44 am
The Connecticut State Supreme Court has upheld the abolishment of the death penalty, including for death-row inmates in the re-examination of the case of State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Kahler v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
On the other hand, should an individual be found not guilty of the alleged offense, there appears to be no basis, or indeed reason, for a governor to issue a pardon or reprieve under the circumstances as the individual is not exposure to an action "by the people" for the same offense in the future as New York States' Criminal Procedure Law §40.20.1 provides that "A person may not be twice prosecuted for the same offense. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
On the other hand, should an individual be found not guilty of the alleged offense, there appears to be no basis, or indeed reason, for a governor to issue a pardon or reprieve under the circumstances as the individual is not exposure to an action "by the people" for the same offense in the future as New York States' Criminal Procedure Law §40.20.1 provides that "A person may not be twice prosecuted for the same offense. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:24 am
The case is Gentes v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm
State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).The same issue raised in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
