Search for: "State v. Sales"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 20,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
See Hodges v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:18 pm
In Hidalgo-Velez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:54 pm
” The case cite is Pacific Coast Trailers, LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 4:02 pm
Granholm v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:54 am
Ticketmaster Corporation v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:08 am
Segal v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:26 pm
Is so, the recent case of Hill v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
” The North Face’s legal counsel sent Winkelmann a cease and desist letter in August 2009, requesting that he stop using the South Butt name and logo and halt all sales, production and promotion of South Butt products. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
In 2019, Belinda sought to sell two works of art, arguing that the relationship between her and her sisters was so poor that they would be unable to manage the collection of 62 works together.[25] Belinda made it clear that a sale was necessary because a fair division of the art was impractical. [26] The lawsuits were not limited to questions of the estate but also included blocking sales. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:26 pm
On June 13, 2011, the Supreme Court for the State of New York, Appellate Division, issued an opinion in the case of Bank of New York v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:15 am
Supreme Court announced its decision in Sale v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
In Ukkestad v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:11 am
” And that means that as long as the website realizes $10,000 a year in gross receipts from “click-through” commissions, the site has to charge users for state sales taxes. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
In Olagues v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 6:31 am
Last Friday, the Fourth Circuit ruled in Ferrell v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:43 am
Counsel presented case law that the ordinary meaning of the words and legislative history supported a broad interpretation of the phrase (Hobbs v Winchester Corpn [1910] 2 KB 471, Place v Rawtenstall Corpn (1916) 86 LJKB 90, Clayton v Sale Urban District Council [1926] 1 KB 415 and Neath Rural District Council v Williams [1951] 1 KB 115). [read post]
