Search for: "Stock v. Stock" Results 4621 - 4640 of 8,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2008, 8:30 am
Miserendino's indictment on a variety of charges in U.S.A. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
If you’re interested in “sentiment analysis capabilities,” don’t bother buying some crappy software license – just click on any random “Me on Facebook v. [read post]
CORE and the ICJ had previously filed a similar legal brief in a case filed by Zambian communities against the mining giant Vedanta (Lungowe v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:58 pm by bvertz
Three related issues were addressed by the Superior Court last month in SMC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:51 am by Joe Mullin
" Now that IPRs are seeing their five-year anniversary, it's a good time to take stock of the process. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:34 am
" In the 2008 case of Pacific Sunware of California, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:06 am by Adam G. Kurtz
(iv) whether they have any business or personal relationship with a member of the compensation committee and (v) whether they own any stock of the company. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 6:05 am by Beth Graham
Based on the analysis of the existing stock of practices and cases, it becomes apparent that there are certain directives that all on-line mediators should apply in order to ensure that all procedures are carried out efficiently and successfully, as these indicators are closely tied to quality. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:11 pm
(v) The analysis of the considered information proxy reveals that insiders enhance market efficiency. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Related Web Resources: Fund Suits May Be Allowed by Supreme Court, Bloomberg.com, November 26, 2007 James LaRue v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 12:58 pm by skelly
Taking Stock of Non-Monetary Privacy Settlement Provisions Standing on Thin Ice? [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Aside from stock certificates, courts may consider any and all “other available evidence” to determine “whether a putative shareholder in fact and law enjoys that status” (Kun v Fulop, 71 AD3d 832 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]