Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 19,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 3:50 pm
By Eric Goldman Smith v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
On May 28, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 1:44 pm
ShareThe April argument in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
Corp. v Fitzgerald, 49 AD3d 747.Further, said the court, "[C]ourts are obligated to give deference to the decision of the arbitrator … This is true even if the arbitrator misapplied the substantive law in the area of the contract. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:29 pm
In Fir Tree Value Master Fund, LP v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
See Wilson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Agudelo v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
Corp. v Fitzgerald, 49 AD3d 747.Further, said the court, "[C]ourts are obligated to give deference to the decision of the arbitrator … This is true even if the arbitrator misapplied the substantive law in the area of the contract. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:25 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:50 am
In his strong dissent at the Federal Circuit, Judge Jimmie Reyna applied Justice Scalia’s precedent from a well-known case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 8:18 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:43 am
Apple v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am
Stephenson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:32 am
In Coker v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:43 am
Apple v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:04 am
Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
The Court recently granted cert. in Christopher v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 8:18 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
