Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 10,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Police officers in California who put their careers on the line to report misconduct or corruption within their departments are to be shielded under the 1st Amendment, per a new ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Police officers in California who put their careers on the line to report misconduct or corruption within their departments are to be shielded under the 1st Amendment, per a new ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Police officers in California who put their careers on the line to report misconduct or corruption within their departments are to be shielded under the 1st Amendment, per a new ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:42 am
Superior Court (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 1001. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
NADN was established in 2008 following a conference of the committees of several statewide associations, including the Florida Circuit-Civil Mediator Society; the California Academy of Distinguished Neutrals; the North Carolina Academy of Superior Court Mediators; the Georgia Academy of Mediators & Arbitrators and the Tennessee Academy of Mediators & Arbitrators. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
”14 In 1942, the Supreme Court of Iowa explained: [P]roperty . . . is applied with many different meanings. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm
Effective September 1, 2013, the Ventura Superior Court will collect a $5.00 Service Fee for all VISA and MasterCard payments that are accepted in person at the point of sale pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 10.820, Government Code, Section 6159 and applicable VISA and MasterCard merchant rules. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 3:26 am
Today's post was shared by WCBlog and comes from jurist.org The New Jersey Superior Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday that knowingly sending a text message to someone who is behind the wheel creates liability for any causes of action that result from a potential collision. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:43 pm
The California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District recently ruled that an employer may be held legally liable for an employee getting drunk at a company party and causing a fatal car accident. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:10 pm
ARB, pending before the Sacramento County Superior Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
It is reasonable to expect that consumers should be able to use everyday household products according to product directions without falling ill, but as a lawsuit filed in Alameda County Superior Court on Tuesday argues, even the use of as seemingly an innocuous personal care item as shampoo can prove hazardous to one’s health. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 2:20 pm
State of California [No. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 2:20 pm
State of California [No. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
Superior Court 217 Cal.App.4th 889 (Citizens for Ceres). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Happy Nails then filed a complaint in Superior Court challenging the DLSE's findings and order. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
The Court then denied the motion to transfer to the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
Then, the employee has one year from the date of the DFEH’s Right to Sue letter to bring suit in Superior Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 1:40 pm
Superior Court (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 889, the California Infill Builders Federation (Infill Builders) submitted an August 16, 2013 letter to the high court requesting that the opinion be depublished pursuant to Rule 8.1125 of the California Rules of Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 2:20 am
In a case that took six weeks to try after 13 years of litigation, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg also will measure the credibility of expert witnesses and their theories in The People of California v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
To quote the Massachusetts high court, which had decided an earlier aspect of the litigation, “A judge in the Superior Court found that when Melendez was nineteen years of age and the victim fourteen, the two were in a relationship and engaged in sexual relations. [read post]
