Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 4621 - 4640 of 11,371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2016, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
The North Carolina Bar Association notes that Bar Association Vice President James W. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
The North Carolina Bar Association notes that Bar Association Vice President James W. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:09 pm by Michael Grossman
Probably, but in light of recent United States Supreme Court decisions, it is unlikely such a state level prohibition would even be constitutional. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State of Washington (Treaty Right to Take Shellfish)California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
" [Big Law Business] * Despite UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander's pleas to use the data to support his opposition to affirmative action, the California State Bar need not disclose the race or ethnicity of those who took the bar exam since 1972 because it would amount to an invasion of privacy for those promised confidentiality. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 3:03 pm
On Fri 13 Jan 2017 the California Constitution Center presents its all-day conference on the California Supreme Court, in partnership with the center’s friends at Hastings Law Journal, the Bar Association of San Francisco, and the Institute of Governmental Studies.This year the conference is at Hastings. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State of Washington (Treaty Right to Take Shellfish) California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:29 am by Legal Profession Prof
The California State Bar Court Review Department recommends a 30-day suspension and probation The hearing judge found that Darryl Wayne Genis, an effective but confrontational criminal defense attorney, violated court orders in two superior courts. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 2:48 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  She certainly did not ask me.There is no basis for a federal court to send a case back to state court unless there is a claim that is "unexhausted," which means it was not made to the state court and is still available there. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:11 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The California Court of Appeals recently released an opinion affirming a lower court’s decision to dismiss a lawsuit filed against an ambulance company and hospital by a man who was injured while under the care of the defendants. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm by Michael Froomkin
In light of evolving US Supreme Court precedent, and the acts of other states, this was anything but a surprising decision. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 6:31 am by Nassiri Law
The California age discrimination lawsuit against tech-giant Google may soon grow exponentially. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 12:49 pm by Immigration Prof
Texas is how could a district court in Texas enter an injunction barring implementation of a nationwide deferred action program. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:58 am by Sarah M Donnelly
If no past employer, then letter of reference from either one California State Court Judge or two attorneys admitted to practice in the state in which they practice. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:07 am by Michael Grossman
Despite these defenses, the facility recently filed a notice of settlement with the Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 9:25 am by Steven Koprince
[Government Executive] A victory in the federal courts for California software company Palantir is either a win for just one company or a much broader decision that will impact how the government buys commercial technology. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:26 am by Quinta Jurecic , Benjamin Wittes
A study by researchers California State University, San Bernardino found that in 2015, hate crimes against Muslims rocketed to their highest level since 2001, with spikes correlated to particularly Islamophobic statements by Trump. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 pm by Lorna Jaynes
As the state’s Second District Court of Appeals recently explained, the burden is usually on a spouse who says he or she can’t work to prove it. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 pm by Lorna Jaynes
As the state’s Second District Court of Appeals recently explained, the burden is usually on a spouse who says he or she can’t work to prove it. [read post]