Search for: "Thomas View" Results 4621 - 4640 of 11,994
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 6:43 am
But millions are expected to pause on Thursday to take in a spectacle already being compared to other political-cultural touchstones, like the Army-McCarthy hearings and Anita Hill’s testimony about Clarence Thomas. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There was a “hearing” scheduled in the New York Senate, which over 100 survivors attended, but only one lawmaker, New York Senator Thomas Duane. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:15 am by Kevin
” 1 Except for Justice Thomas, that is, who stuck to his view that school officials can do virtually anything they want to students because that’s the way it was in 1789. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:56 am by MBettman
  Since Justice Fischer was on the appellate panel in this case, he has recused himself, and Judge Thomas Wright of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals sat in his stead. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
And here, I would take a different view than Alan on this, because I think it’s a much more difficult question. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
Two weeks ago, CNN reported that “White House lawyers have begun researching impeachment procedures in an effort to prepare for what officials still believe is a distant possibility that President Donald Trump could have to fend off attempts to remove him from office. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
--> (Ancient Automobile Trinidad, Cuba 2015 Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)I am pleased to let those interested know that I have posted a draft of my essay, "The Human Rights Obligations of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm by Calvin TerBeek
 (I am uninterested here in the thoroughly stale critique that Justices Scalia and Thomas never grounded their affirmative action decisions in originalism). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
In my view, a careful review of Mandel and its progeny is essential to understanding where the Fourth Circuit deviated from precedent. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Quinta Jurecic
In Blackman’s view, the IRAP decision is entirely about Trump qua Trump, and is therefore illegitimate as a work of legal reasoning; in Litman, Murillo, and Vladeck’s view, the decision is based on a neutral principle separate from the fact that Donald Trump is the President of the United States, and is therefore legitimate. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by emagraken
As Thomas J. observed in van Soest (at para. 103), “[c]ourts can be informed by the expert opinion of modern medical knowledge”, “without needing to address the question whether the mental suffering is a recognisable psychiatric illness or not”. [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:00 pm by Gene Quinn
Johnson Gas Appliance Co., 917 F. 2d 1574 (1990), which announced its view that the Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act of 1988 made 1391(c) applicable to patent infringement actions. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, David Levine and Thomas Kearns discuss the court’s decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:33 pm by Thomas Wilson
Thomas WilsonThe European Commission increasingly issues large document requests in complex merger cases. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:34 pm by Kevin Johnson
The case involved an immigrant from Mexico convicted of what could be viewed as a “sex crime. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:17 am by Howard Knopf
This could have immensely anti-competitive implications, for example with respect to the market for ear buds or selfie sticks or another smart phone accessories.In my respectful view, given the “effectively uncontested” nature of this proceeding and the novel and important issues that were raised, the learned Judge could or should have merely entered a non-precedential decision with a minimal recitation of the “effectively unopposed” factual outline, just as he did… [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:17 am by Howard Knopf
This could have immensely anti-competitive implications, for example with respect to the market for ear buds or selfie sticks or another smart phone accessories.In my respectful view, given the “effectively uncontested” nature of this proceeding and the novel and important issues that were raised, the learned Judge could or should have merely entered a non-precedential decision with a minimal recitation of the “effectively unopposed” factual outline, just as he did… [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:23 am
Thomas McCarthy's on the CAFC's ruling last week in the INSIGNIA case, wherein the court vacated and remanded the Board's decision due to improper consideration of the fifth du Pont factor. [read post]