Search for: "True v True"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 33,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 7:22 pm
Yes, it's true, she says, that the California Supreme Court held in Hofsheier that it violates equal protection when a defendant is subject to mandatory lifetime registration as a sex offender for engaging in oral copulation with a minor but less than that for full-on intercourse. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:15 am
There is, of course, the separate problem of racial targeting in immigration stops that doesn't arise in drunk driving checkpoints, but that wouldn't apply to a law that required the police to check everyone for immigration violations, as I understand at least parts of the Arizona law dictate.Or one could argue that drunk driving stops are less burdensome than sobriety checkpoints, but I'm not sure that's empirically true. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:46 am
"Lowery says that he wasn't serious; that he was just blowing off steam to his wife, and so this wasn't a true "threat" -- but was instead protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
When a defendant criminally pumps and dumps, and the underlying stock's not a total sham, the value of the loss (for purposes of the guidelines) is the difference between the true and the artificial market capitalization. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:03 pm
Which is true testament an honest and rational attempt to properly distinguish a case: a description that makes the differences between the two cases matter, and make both cases understandable given their factual predicates.So I was very impressed with this opinion, especially since the issue seemed so facially intuitive at the outset. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 7:45 pm
I'm not entirely persuaded that's true: It depends on what we mean by "unethical," and that word may perhaps have different connotations for different people.So there's a lot in here to feast upon. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:12 am
Decision 8th Cir Warner Bros Avela Public Domain(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })(); [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 902 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a majority of 4-1 in the case concerning the true interpretation of 5 versions of a clause which has been described as a service charge clause in the long lease agreement of 25 chalets in the respondent’s leisure park. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:40 am
True. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:51 am
Sure, maybe it's technically okay to simply say "Well, the police officer said X, so what do I care what the true facts are? [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
"True that. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:02 pm
Let me give you a list of things not to do: (1) Have sexually provocative chats with an alleged 13-year old over the internet over a six-month period; (2) Eventually reveal your true age (after pretending to be a 19-year old "stud") and identity to the unknown person on the other end of the line; (3) Transmit video footage of yourself masterbating to said alleged 13-year old; (4) Travel for planned sex with said (needless to say, fictional) 13-year old. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
But if (1) is true then prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument is never reversible error, and this seems an extremely poor case in which to argue (2) given that (as far as I can tell from the opinion) the only evidence against defendants consisted of (notoriously unreliable) eyewitness identifications given over a year after the crime. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:44 pm
I gotta agree with Judge Rymer on this one, and respectfully disagree with Judge Thomas.Yes, it's true that there's a lot of spam out there, including pornographic spam. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
It is true that Bank of America took a bath during the financial crisis and likely suffered from the acquisition of Merrill Lynch (although it remains to be seen, as the market recovers and brokerage activity picks up, whether this will be a short term harm). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
In my preview of Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:52 pm
Enter Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 11:25 am
This could involve importunity that the testator could not resist, compelling them to make decisions against their true desires. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
Case citation: Davis v. [read post]
