Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 4621 - 4640
of 9,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm
One might think that such a concession is effectively no different than a guilty plea, and the decision whether to plead guilty is fundamental one for the defendant and not counsel (Jones v Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [1989]). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:58 pm
The plaintiff in the recent case of Ramirez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:48 am
The SCC will review whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in denying the CRA order.Read the Federal Court of Appeal’s decisionRelated law firm bulletin:Supreme Court of Canada to decide if a lawyer subject to enforcement proceedings can claim solicitor-client privilege, Bennett Jones LLPDec. 5 – Federal – Guindon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
Jones, 9 NY3d 259, 262, 848 NYS2d 600 (2007), citing People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:17 am
" DOJ v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
See, Jones v Bill, 10 NY3d 550 (2008); Tirado v ELRAC Inc., 54 AD3d 261 (3rd Dept. 2008). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am
Jones, No. 05-91-01815-CV, 1992 WL 211068, at *3 (Tex. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am
Jones, No. 05-91-01815-CV, 1992 WL 211068, at *3 (Tex. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Jones.* Down the Tubes: H&M Breached Settlement Agreement by Infringing PatentJani analyses Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), a decision that dealt with a UK patent concerning the tubular fabric in underwired garments such as brassieres.* Goodbye, good luck! [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:15 am
JONES, ANTOINE 10-8145 SMITH, JUAN v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:42 am
November 2001, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:25 pm
Recent Developments – United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:01 am
This was clearly stated in the 1993, Dallas Court of Appeals case, Jones v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am
Jones, the 3rd District upholds a search which began with a traffic stop after the driver exited the interstate without using a turn signal. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge gave the main judgment, with which Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen agreed. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:41 am
Yesterday's New York Times also contained this article by Linda Greenhouse on the issue (a separate Times article discussing Jones v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:12 pm
Jones v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:04 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937). [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 10:11 pm
Jones v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
This past week, a different high court sat to hear a new privacy challenge in Jones v. [read post]
