Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 32,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
Id. at *8-9 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).Disclosure of Limited Test Results Does Not Limit Claimed Compound"The plain language of the claim does not include the narrowing limitation that the Appellants desire. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:31 pm
Ralphs Grocery Company: (1) Does a big-rig truck driver owe a duty of care to freeway motorists not to park for non-emergency reasons in an “Emergency Parking Only” area at the side of a freeway? [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:12 pm
., Sept. 8, 2011), the court held unanimously that the state of Virginia lacked standing to challenge the law. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:39 pm
Finn, No. 10-15641 (12-8-11) (Reinhardt with B. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
(You can read more about it in these blog posts: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.) [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
Additionally, there is a strong case for valid abrogation under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, in three different respects.Article 1 - Plan of Convention WaiverArticle 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the Constitution provides Congress the power to regulate copyrights:"The Congress shall have Power ... [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 1:50 pm
When it comes to the 8(a) Program, the changes discussed here seem to indicate that the SBA wants to: 1) make the 8(a) Program fall more into line with its other programs; 2) encourage more applicants to the 8(a) Program; and 3) grant more flexibility to current participants. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 10:44 pm
") does not apply to trademarks. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:18 am
The newspaper tear sheets consisted of two parts: (1) almost full facsimiles of classified pages dated 4/8/2007 and 4/15/2007 which were not legible and had the top and bottom cut off, but bear the publication date; and (2) enlargements of the advertisements specific to the Employer’s application, but only the 4/8/2007 enlargement specifically bore the date of publication and name of publication. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:27 am
However, as noted in the old blog post and the comments thereto, perhaps Article III:4 does not apply because the measure constitutes government procurement that falls under Article III:8(a), as the Ontario Power Authority is a government entity. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 7:13 am
"[8] The treaty would replace the antiquated "laundry list" of extraditable offenses with a "dual criminality clause," as well as modernizing the "political offense clause. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
S.B. 8, which went into effect on September 1, altered that long-standing status quo. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Both the patent proprietor and the opponent filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had maintained the patent-in-suit in amended form.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Doe, 2021 FC 181 at para 8. [4] See s 41.26(1)(a),(b), Copyright Act. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:38 pm
§ 207(a) (1) does not apply. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:21 pm
Id. at 1 n.1. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:31 pm
At the conclusion of the IPR, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sided with Unified – finding all challenged claims (1-8) of the ‘679 patent unpatentable as obvious over the combination of two prior art references, Wong and Beauregard. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:55 am
Like a lot of law, it does so by referencing other parts of the Code. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:59 pm
However, according to Article 6, 7, 8 and 10 of the Guideline, the validity of franchising contracts will not be affected even if: 1) the contract is not executed in writing; 2) the contract is not registered with competent authorities; 3) the franchisor does not have 2 direct stores or has operated less than 1 year; 4) the parties to the franchising did not obtain relevant approval or qualification where necessary at the commencement of the franchising but… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:17 am
So what does that mean for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)? [read post]
