Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 29,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 8:55 am
Although death sentences are imposed regularly in California, there have been only thirteen executions in the thirty-plus years since the current death penalty law was enacted in 1978. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:34 am
One of the most controversial elements of the California Independent Medical Review (IMR) process is that the identity of the reviewer is to remain confidential and that there is no right of appeal.Texas has had IMR for some time, though it differs from California in that in Texas IMR decisions can be appealed. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Antitrust Trade Regulation Unfair Competition Misleading Statements False Advertising Design Defect and Failure-to-Warn Theories of Liability The FDA Did Not Create a Safe Harbor Statute of Limitations Tolling Agreement Consumer Law Drugs & Biotech Health Law California Law Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., and Ethicon US, LLC (collectively, Ethicon) appeal an adverse judgment… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 11:05 am
The study, commissioned by the agency and required by law, said the agency needed to improve its procedures involving conflicts of interest and grant application reviewers. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Regulations inadequately protect minors from exposure to alcohol marketing in Australia, wrote Belinda Reeve of Australia’s University of Sydney Law School in a recent article for the Queensland University of Technology Law Review. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
The California Supreme Court granted review. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Rosen (Alameda County Superior Court on writ to California Court of Appeal to review the trial court's denial of the demurrers) 5. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:00 am
(You can refresh your recollection by reviewing our discussion of California law, here.) [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:15 am
This post is based on their recent paper, forthcoming in the Southern California Law Review. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Most famously, he set forth his concerns in a Harvard Law Review essay reviewing Judge Robert Katzmann’s book on statutory interpretation. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
The focus of today’s coverage of the Court is yesterday’s ruling by the California Supreme Court that sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage have standing under state law to defend the ballot initiative, and in particular the likelihood that the Proposition 8 issue will come to the Court anytime soon. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 3:31 pm
Traffic safety laws have also been the focal point of statistical rankings. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm
What Employers Should Do Now: Employers should review their payroll practices for exempt and non-exempt employees, to avoid running afoul of Sullivan and California wage-hour laws when sending employees to work in California. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
Nomi Stolzenberg (University of Southern California - Gould School of Law) has posted Righting the Relationship between Race and Religion in Law (Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
What is it about the People's Republic of California that makes one feel as if everything he learned in law school is exactly wrong? [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:34 am
The post Pen-and-paper or electronic timekeeping: time records under CA law appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Our own review of California law on strict products liability persuades us that Bolger was correctly decided and that strict liability may attach under the circumstances of this case. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
The California rule is that the parties may obtain judicial review of the merits by express agreement. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 4:23 am
In the work comp world, a prime example is pending before the California Supreme Court in the Stevens v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d §§ 3.06, 3.07, 3.130, 3.131; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 2, § 2.06.] [read post]
