Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 28,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2020, 9:05 am
Some of the factors that the Family Court will consider include who was the primary nurturer of the child, the parenting skills of each of the parents, the physical and mental health of each of the parents, work schedules, family relationships, and, particularly if the child is older, the child’s preference. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm
Nowicki-Eldridge (Indian Child Welfare Act) Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
In Quiroz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act)Aimee H. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 11:09 am
In L.N. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:04 am
In Parr v. [read post]
6 May 2006, 8:54 pm
Soiseth, 2006 BCSC 652, contains an in-depth analysis of the affect of evidence of an illegal scheme is admissible to rebut a presumption that when a parent contributes funds to a child to purchase property in the child's name the parent intends to make a gift to the child. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:11 am
Amadore v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:00 am
” Bruni v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:00 am
” Bruni v. [read post]
24 Jan 2006, 2:38 am
The High Court in England seems to have made it far easier for a child-abducting parent to prove the defenses of consent and acquiescence in a Hague Convention child abduction case than has previously been the case.In CJ v KJ [2005] EWHC 2998 (Fam), Mr. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:34 pm
Such a claim was behind the New Mexico Supreme Court's decision in Provencio v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
For the best interest of the child, we look to Holley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
True, they cannot be sentenced to death for any crime, Roper v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
Davila v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 10:12 pm
Gress v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 8:58 am
In the decision of JDB v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:00 am
" To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Morgan P v. [read post]
