Search for: "DAVID N."
Results 4641 - 4660
of 5,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 6:36 am
Rhea just failed External Communications 101: answer in a way that presents something positive – such as, “You’re absolutely right we need to have good control over inventory; that’s why we’re doing the first system-wide counting in N years. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Townsend Professor Yale Law School Michal Barzuza Associate Professor of Law University of Virginia School of Law Laura N. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:24 pm
Joireman.Joireman, Sandra Fullerton.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, c2011.KQC772 .J65 2011 AfricaCivil procedure in South Africa / Roshana Kelbrick.Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands : Kluwer Law International ; Frederick, MD : Sold and distributed in North, Central, and South America by Aspen Publishers, c2010.KTL1710 .C584 2010AntitrustAn institutional assessment of antitrust policy : the Latin American experience / by Ignacio De León.León, Ignacio… [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm
The profound harm resulting from their violation is sufficiently distinct in nature from those of existing torts that, as the workers say, “[i]n the same way that torture is something more than battery, slavery is more than an amalgam of unlawful confinement, assault and unjust enrichment”. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
See id. at 2123 & n.1 (noting that forty-three states are "shall-issue" states, in which pretty much all law-abidi [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
David Zimmer (Harvard 2010 / W. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
Ocean Colony Condominium Ass’n, 173 F. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:43 am
Ted has a tunnel, David has a bridge, Yaz deserves a way! [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
’ Wilson, 421 U.S. at 315 n.6. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
" See id. at *33 (likening such process to the unfulfilled hopeful expectations of David Copperfield's Wilkins Micawber). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
She wrote that “[i]n an appropriate future case, this Court should decide this issue. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
David Schell, 16-107, asks under what circumstances a court of appeals should vacate a lower court’s decision if, during the appeal of that decision, the appeal is mooted because of the appellant’s voluntary conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Whether the Court will in fact accept those recommendations remains to be seen: as a 2009 article by Melanie Wachtell and David Thompson reports, although the Court overwhelmingly follows the Solicitor General’s suggestion, it does not always do so. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
Rev. 1275 (2017); David B. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
Back in 2011, at a Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference, Chief Justice John Roberts took a cheap shot at law professors and law reviews when he intoned: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The application notice stated that the Claimant was not complaining about the Dismissal Allegations because (as the Defendant contended) they were true, and that “[i]n the light of the truth of the dismissal allegations […] publication of [the Interception Meanings] [could not] have caused serious harm to the claimant’s reputation”. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 10:26 pm
Back in the worldly word, Patently O -- which promiscuously shares itself with millions of readers every year -- turns its pen over to David McGowan who discusses why we should not interpret the recent Quanta decision too broadly. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
Revoking your Will the old fashioned way: “[I]n 2001 decedent took his original copy of the 1997 will, urinated on it and then burned it. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Booksellers Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
After all of the complicated arguments in the wage/penalty debate, future points and authorities regarding the issue can now be boiled down to a single sentence and citation: The "additional hour of pay" due to an employee under Labor Code § 226.7 is a wage, not a penalty. [read post]
