Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 4641 - 4660 of 32,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 10:18 am
The newspaper tear sheets consisted of two parts: (1) almost full facsimiles of classified pages dated 4/8/2007 and 4/15/2007 which were not legible and had the top and bottom cut off, but bear the publication date; and (2) enlargements of the advertisements specific to the Employer’s application, but only the 4/8/2007 enlargement specifically bore the date of publication and name of publication. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:27 am by Simon Lester
 However, as noted in the old blog post and the comments thereto, perhaps Article III:4 does not apply because the measure constitutes government procurement that falls under Article III:8(a), as the Ontario Power Authority is a government entity. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 7:13 am
"[8] The treaty would replace the antiquated "laundry list" of extraditable offenses with a "dual criminality clause," as well as modernizing the "political offense clause. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am by Josh Blackman
S.B. 8, which went into effect on September 1, altered that long-standing status quo. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Both the patent proprietor and the opponent filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had maintained the patent-in-suit in amended form.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Doe, 2021 FC 181 at para 8. [4] See s 41.26(1)(a),(b), Copyright Act. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
At the conclusion of the IPR, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sided with Unified – finding all challenged claims (1-8) of the ‘679 patent unpatentable as obvious over the combination of two prior art references, Wong and Beauregard. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:55 am by Cathy Moran
 Like a lot of law, it does so by referencing other parts of the Code. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:59 pm by IP Dragon
However, according to Article 6, 7, 8 and 10 of the Guideline, the validity of franchising contracts will not be affected even if: 1) the contract is not executed in writing; 2) the contract is not registered with competent authorities; 3) the franchisor does not have 2 direct stores or has operated less than 1 year; 4) the parties to the franchising did not obtain relevant approval or qualification where necessary at the commencement of the franchising but… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:17 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
So what does that mean for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)? [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
Because it is a content-neutral statute that focuses on forbidden effects without referring to expression at all, a conviction based on a violation of ORS 166.025(1)(b) does not violate Article I, section 8, unless it is unconstitutionally applied. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by David Lynn
“Bedbug” letters on the Form 10 and the Form S-1 were sent on October 8. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:41 pm
 One man in his sixties, however, who died from cancer in Texas, had a Salmonella infection linked to the outbreak, which may have contributed to his death.The following states have been affected:Arkansas (10 persons), Arizona (39), California (10), Colorado (8), Connecticut (4), Florida (1), Georgia (18), Idaho (3), Illinois (78), Indiana (11), Kansas (14), Kentucky (1), Maine (1), Maryland (25), Massachusetts (18), Michigan (4), Minnesota (2), Missouri… [read post]
However, post DRA, the 10 month penalty period does not begin until (1) the Medicaid applicant resides in a nursing home, (2) has “spent down” assets under $2,500 for Medicaid eligibility, (3) has applied an application for Medicaid, and (4) has been approved for Medicaid, “but for” the Gift. [read post]