Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 4641 - 4660 of 22,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Pollard (No. 10-1104), the United States Supreme Court held that employees of privately run federal prisons cannot be sued for money damages for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
Section 81 of Title 25 requires approval by the Secretary of the Interior for certain contracts that relate to "Indian Lands," and defines that term as "lands the title to which is held by the United States in trust for an Indian tribe or lands the title to which is held by an Indian tribe subject to a restriction by the United States against alienation. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:30 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the petitioner argues that under the Fourth Amendment, “[h]is general acquiescence to a search of his bag … did not extend to the destruction of his personal property,” the court could “bring greater clarity to one’s constitutional rights during a consensual search. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:07 am by Ezra Rosser
Meyer 4(2), pp. 91–112 Reconstructing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to More Effectively Alleviate Food Insecurity in the United States Craig Gundersen, Brent Kreider, John V. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:12 am by Jon Gelman
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including but not limited to title V and section 604 of the 1974 Act, do proclaim that: (1) The designation of Bangladesh as a beneficiary developing country under the GSP is suspended on the date that is 60 days after the date this proclamation is published in the… [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for his statements on Facebook. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 10:45 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note -- Jon asked me to step in for a few days while he's tending to other business.]United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:12 pm
" Judge Berzon, dissenting, begins her opinion this way: "The majority's peculiar interpretation of the word 'reasonableness' not only defies its common usage in the English language, but more importantly, runs contrary to what this court decided, sitting en banc, in United States v. [read post]