Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 4641 - 4660 of 8,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by Michael Lumer
The money, which is a substantial award by New York's Court of Claim standards (as partially reflected by Jabbar Collins's settlement for $3 million for 16 years), does not come close to making up for his losses.On August 20, 1996, Daniel Gristwood was convicted of the attempted murder of his wife. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:12 pm by Nathan Swire
On Dec. 20, the Philippine government announced that a new beaching ramp is under construction and that the government plans to repair the military barracks and runway on the island. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Albright is so eager to attract patent cases to Waco that he makes it very hard for companies like Intel to defend themselves. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:18 am
Contrarily to trademark and design law, the new Patents Act does not specify the amount of such indemnity nor does it establish a cap. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:24 pm by John Watkins
AVVO, which rates lawyers on a scale of 1 to 10, is new and is controversial. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am by William McGrath
In the older case, the FCPA Sting case, Judge Richard Leon dismissed Count 1 (on the grounds that there was not sufficient evidence to that the six defendants participated in the overarching conspiracy to violate the FCPA) as to all six defendants in Trial Group No. 2. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am by William McGrath
In the older case, the FCPA Sting case, Judge Richard Leon dismissed Count 1 (on the grounds that there was not sufficient evidence to that the six defendants participated in the overarching conspiracy to violate the FCPA) as to all six defendants in Trial Group No. 2. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Courts have held individual defendants liable for a corporation’s conduct where they “(1) participated in the acts or had authority to control the corporate defendant and (2) knew of the acts or practices,” and the court found the same logic persuasive here. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
Specifically, Section 10(b) of the 1933 Act and Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Act regulate fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. [2] To obtain a conviction under these provisions, it must be proved that: (1)     (a) the defendant engaged in a fraudulent scheme, or (b) made a material misstatement, or (c) omitted material information to one to whom the defendant … [read post]