Search for: "Does 1 - 20"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 28,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 3:32 am
Here’s a few highlights (and more from Ning’s blog): 1. [read post]
10 May 2024, 11:32 am
Consumers and politicians have complained about junk fees for more than 20 years. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
Human to human spread of the coronavirus was first announced on January 20, 2020. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 9:34 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (including California, Nevada and other western states) had formerly improvised that the key Bankruptcy Code terms involved, Section 365(c)(1), in order to prevent a debtor from taking on a contract while it does not hold the right to consign it. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:47 am
This results in a gigantic unfunded liability, which has been estimated at $2.549 billion as of July 1 of last year. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Feb. 1, 2019). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:17 am
G 4/95's headnotes read: "1. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:54 pm
If the same employee suffered only a 20% loss of use of the thumb, the specific loss benefit would be $6,500 (65 X $500 X .20). [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:52 am
Custodial care is care that does not rise to the level of skilled care. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:07 am
Judge Davis' statements in the order provide some useful guidance as to when a case does and doesn't require such modifications. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Claim 1: 1. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Deluca, 1:20-cv-00087, which centered around a home builder and contractor who failed to successfully deliver on a major home renovation. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
Comment 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 12:00 am
pagewanted=all&_r=0 [20] Id. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:12 am
They can therefore only be considered as a design option that the skilled person would choose for non-technical reasons, and for this reason the subject-matter of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step". [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:20 am
In June 2022, the examiner assigned to the Application's designation for the EU (the Examiner) issued a provisional partial refusal of the Application, on the grounds that the Mark was ineligible for registration, pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation 2017/0001 (EUTMR), because it was devoid of distinctive character for a large part of the goods applied for, namely those in classes 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:58 am
Dakota Access, a private Texas company, filed its permit application on January 20, 2015. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm
Peter Franchot, et al., No. 1:21-CV-00410 (D. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:54 pm
According to the Acting Inspector General, “in only a few limited special situations” does Social Security Administration call beneficiaries and request personal information. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:17 am
This article is for informational purposes only and does not contain or convey legal advice. [read post]
