Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 4641 - 4660 of 6,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 3:54 am
Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Rules 5.1, 16(b), 24, 26(a), 26(b)(2), 26(b)(5), 26(f), 33, 34(a), 34(b), 37(f), 45], and the Federal Rules of Evidence [Rules 404, 408, 606, 609], among others, took effect on December 1, 2006. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:22 pm by Gideon
Perhaps the good judge missed this from footnote 33: Here, the Court finds that Ring does apply in Florida and the Florida sentencing statute is unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Negligence and Third-Party Misconduct 31: Otherwise Negligent Behavior Exacerbated by Third-Party Misconduct 32: Distraction 33 & 34: Crime by/on/with Employees/Tenants/Property 35: Duties to Aid 36: Duty to Avoid Provoking Criminals? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
(2) If the Requested Party does not extradite its own national, it shall, at the request of the Requesting Party, submit the case to its competent authorities in order that proceedings may be taken if its law so provides. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Charles O'Mahony
Does Article 12(2) contain an irebuttable presumption of legal capacity to exercise rights? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by American News Service
For further information, please call 1-800-654-NEWS or e-mail tc@americannews.com. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:45 am by Rob Robinson
Arnold - http://tinyurl.com/3tc48t9 (PR Web) eDiscovery Basics: Preservation of ESI, Part 1 (Vol. 1, No. 5) http://tinyurl.com/3k6cd8w (Gibson Dunn) Gartner Publishes First Magic Quadrant for eDiscovery Software - http://tinyurl.com/4yefekq (Aaref Hilaly) Inconsistent Assessment of Responsiveness in eDiscovery: Difference of Opinion or Human Error? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm by Bexis
 Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ experts may not establish causation by reliance on the FDA Notice.Slip op. at 33-34 (citation to McClain omitted). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am by Maria Roche
  The Court noted at [§12 -13] that where the SSHD does not have to make the deportation order for a foreign criminal on the ground that such deportation would be in breach of the criminal’s rights under the ECHR [Exception 1 of Section 33 of the UKBA 2007], the SSHD is not prevented from making such an order and in such circumstances the statutory provision that the “deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good”… [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:12 am by emagraken
The examination for discovery is the most likely source of such evidence. para. 8. [33] Nevertheless, neither the court nor the SCCR require that an examination for discovery precede an application under Rules 7-1(13) and (14). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Howard Knopf
That being said, parties are reminded that the Board does not need all existing relevant information to set fair tariffs. [read post]