Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 4641 - 4660 of 4,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2007, 7:27 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Crommelin, an Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided missile frigate of the United States Navy, [22] has seen its share of these regulatory stops in South America and elsewhere. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITConstitutional LawDNA Act Does Not Violate Fourth Amendment When Applied to Convicted Felons Sentenced to Probation United States of America, appellee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:23 pm
(Although 70% of Americans believe the United States will legalize civil unions within a decade, almost half of all Americans worry that this is not progress. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:37 pm
Gonzales: Firings were not improper Gonzales: What I can say is this: I know the reasons why I asked you — these United States attorneys to leave. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
  The Union eliminated the white Southerners' freedom of choice - which is what any effective law does to anybody subject to it.The great tragedy that befell the United States in the second half of the 19th century was the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:48 pm
United States, 199 F.3d 37, 45 (1st Cir. 1999), once subject matter jurisdiction attaches, "courts may exceed their authority or otherwise err without loss of jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
  [16]  Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:12 am by Dariusz Czuchaj
Geographical Distribution of Parties Though the geographical spread of named parties to WIPO UDRP cases (gTLD and ccTLD) reached 137 countries at the end of December 2006, the most frequently named party country both for complainants and for respondents continued to be the United States of America (USA). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 10:31 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 377 U.S. 271 (1964) and United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]