Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 4641 - 4660 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2012, 3:22 am by Andrew Dickinson
Opinion: Case C-332/11, ProRail NV v Xpedys NV – the Regulation does not preclude a Member State court, acting under its own procedural rules, from ordering the taking of expert evidence, partly in another Member State, provided that the performance of that part of the investigation does not require the cooperation of the authorities of that Member State. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
"Harley Lewin (McCarter & English) for Louboutin stated that they considered the decision to be "a significant win, not only for Louboutin, but for the fashion industry in general". [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm by Charon QC
In Bowman v Secular Society Limited [1917] AC 406 at 457, Lord Sumner refers to the older Taylor’s case of 1676 1 Vent, as follows: ‘…and Hale said that such kind of wicked blasphemous words were not only an offence to God and religion, but a crime against the Laws, State, and Government, and therefore punishable in this Court. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:01 am by Jie Huang
Importantly, this also avoids Taiwan residents to follow the example of Tza Yap Shum v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Its general rule, Article 4 (1), points to the law of the state in which the damage occured, i.e. either the state of the investors’ home or that of their bank accounts. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:43 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In fact the Swiss Private International Law Act 1987 and the English Arbitration Act, 1996 have dropped off "only"  as well.4. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:33 am by The Complex Litigator
" Reyes signed an acknowledgment of his receipt of the Arbitration Agreement stating that he could read the Arbitration Agreement in both English and Spanish. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am by Howard Friedman
He wanted a separate Nation of Islam service entirely in English. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm by The JAG HUNTER
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm by The JAG HUNTER
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm by The JAG HUNTER
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]