Search for: "HARDING v. HAND" Results 4641 - 4660 of 6,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
Teaching criminal law at Fordham Law School, John Pfaff posts at PrawfsBlawg about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Cavazos v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by jpfaff
And perhaps that is what actually happened; and if so, the Supreme Court’s majority is surely right that that is precluded by AEDPA and Jackson v Virginia. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:50 am by Angus McCullough QC
This report was based on the first-hand experience of those who have acted as special advocates. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:35 pm
This is somehat different from the approach taken in Totalise v Motley Fool concerning whether an ISP should pay for its costs if opposing a Norwich Pharmacal order, and it is, in my view, the wrong decision. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Michael O'Hear
  On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:16 am by John L. Welch
At the Trademark Blog, Marty Schwimmer reports (here) that Cavern City Tours Ltd. has filed a complaint seeking Section 1071(b) review of the Board's decision in Cavern City Tours Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert  In the Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Lara
  Maybe we should ask the legal eagles representing Chick-fil-A, whom I suspect now have first-hand knowledge of the answer to that question. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]