Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 7,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Surveillance The Kensington and Chelsea Council have admitted to trialing surveillance software on two housing estates in North Kensington after OpenDemocracy reported it was the only council in the country to do so, the BBC reports. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
This week, that proved to be correct, including for some closely watched cases with significant amicus support. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
The first, Atkins v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
First, in Burwell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:50 am
Walters is the North Carolina case most closely on point and it seems to say that Caballes remains the proper framework in most cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Lord Irvine also identified what he called a more nuanced variant of this idea, in the Supreme Court’s judgment in what he called “the culmination of a notorious line of cases” on housing (covered in depth at Nearly Legal) Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
The “drama” seems contrived, as they hide behind closed curtains to avoid being seen, but keep the camera crews on the inside of the house—broadcasting their hiding to the world. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am
" Farmer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the local government in Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
” The Ninth Circuit interpreted what this means at the end of May in the closely-followed case of Perfect 10 v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Arizona 2013 -> Court finds DMCA violation in DISH NETWORK, LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
In Hunter, voters overturned an Akron ordinance that was enacted to address widespread racial discrimination in housing sales and rentals had forced many to live in segregated housing that was substandard and dangerous. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 3:17 pm
Like with NFIB v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
A fixation with revenge does not automatically close the door to a determination that the writing is of public concern. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Martinez-Larraga, No. 06-40489 "Convictions and sentences for drug-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) the prosecutor commented on their post-arrest, pre-trial, silence during its rebuttal closing argument; 2) the government improperly bolstered its witnesses' testimony during closing argument; and 3) the district court erred by denying one defendant a downward adjustment of his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 3B1.2. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Pakdel v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is a close second. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The trial and closing submissions were in private. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
. 'Don't tell anyone or go to the Police about this, because I am watching you closely. [read post]
