Search for: "House v. House"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 41,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2010, 10:40 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:32 pm
But it wouldn't exactly work that way.I was also thinking that if Prop. 65 warnings were required for things that might expose you to marijuana smoke, then the beach parking lot across the street from my house should definitely have a warning as well. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm
(Apparently, according to their commercials, Farmers' policies cover obscure space junk falling onto your house, but not overflowing toilets. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:23 pm
Would I enjoy having to go through all the many steps required to remodel that house -- including getting City approval, dealing with a CEQA appeal, etc.? [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 3:30 pm
The approach taken by the FTT followed Parker v Waller (2012) UKUT 301 (LC) (our note) on sections 73 and 74 of the Housing Act 2004 (as have indeed all RRO cases). [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
The Federal Court in Disability Advocates Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:06 am
Supreme Court issued a series of rulings culminating in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
City of Miami, which involve the scope of the federal Fair Housing Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2018, the Supreme Court determined in Lucia v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:44 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm
Baker v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
Fund v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:29 pm
It's one thing to say that a sentence of 78 years to life (for which the defendant will be eligible for parole, at the earliest, when he's 119) isn't "cruel and unusual" for a defendant who left threatening messages for his ex-wife and then drunkenly showed up at her house with a knife, only to be promptly shot in the groin by her shotgun-toting husband. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:42 pm
" So an in-house lawyer can sometimes use confidential information to prove discrimination by an employer or to prove retaliatory discharge. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:00 pm
Let me give you a running commentary of my thought process as I read this one:"On the morning of March 19, 2006, defendant was partying in his house with C.G., B.M., and two other gentlemen. . . . [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:57 am
Hilmi and Associates Ltd v 20 Pembridge Villas Freehold Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 314; [2010] WLR (D) 90 “Where, before the coming into force of the Companies Act 2006, a corporate tenant served notice, pursuant to s 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, seeking to exercise a statutory right to acquire the applicable freehold, it was required, for the notice to be valid, to affix its corporate seal, or to supply the signature of two directors or a… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm
Our thanks to Legal Action’s ‘Recent Developments in Housing Law’ , Edwards Duthie and Liz Davies for the case.Lappin v Surace Romford County Court 13 June 2012Ms Surace was the assured shorthold tenant of Mr Lappin on a 12 month term to 19 April 2010. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm
Our thanks to Legal Action’s ‘Recent Developments in Housing Law’ , Edwards Duthie and Liz Davies for the case.Lappin v Surace Romford County Court 13 June 2012Ms Surace was the assured shorthold tenant of Mr Lappin on a 12 month term to 19 April 2010. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
That relaxation was developed in the subsequent House of Lords decision in Barker v Corus and by the introduction of section 3 of the Compensation Act 2006. [read post]
