Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 7,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2014, 6:16 am
Judge Fields offers a curious explanation: We’re not always going to agree, but if we’re always trying to do the right thing, then the best thing happens for both the public and the citizens accused. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
City of Chicago, that a sufficiently long tradition of erroneous past decisions can trump reinterpreting the Constitution according to its proper, original meaning. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:27 pm
Improved transparency is critical to re-building the trust that our allies have in our leadership in international law. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The "Digital Media Law Project" With this shift of focus, the project was able to respond to a range of important legal issues, including: First Amendment protection for the use of cameras to record the actions of public officials; legal constraints on newsgathering at the 2012 U.S. political conventions and the use of cameras at the 2012 national elections; the abuse of trademark law as a method of suppressing critical speech; the impact of legal regimes governing… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The "Digital Media Law Project" With this shift of focus, the project was able to respond to a range of important legal issues, including: First Amendment protection for the use of cameras to record the actions of public officials; legal constraints on newsgathering at the 2012 U.S. political conventions and the use of cameras at the 2012 national elections; the abuse of trademark law as a method of suppressing critical speech; the impact of legal regimes governing… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The "Digital Media Law Project" With this shift of focus, the project was able to respond to a range of important legal issues, including: First Amendment protection for the use of cameras to record the actions of public officials; legal constraints on newsgathering at the 2012 U.S. political conventions and the use of cameras at the 2012 national elections; the abuse of trademark law as a method of suppressing critical speech; the impact of legal regimes governing… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 4:33 am
Likewise, a science blog published by scientists who write letters to federal agencies urging certain decisions on global warming or public health or space funding wouldn’t merit a press credential for the same reason. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
The "Digital Media Law Project" With this shift of focus, the project was able to respond to a range of important legal issues, including: First Amendment protection for the use of cameras to record the actions of public officials; legal constraints on newsgathering at the 2012 U.S. political conventions and the use of cameras at the 2012 national elections; the abuse of trademark law as a method of suppressing critical speech; the impact of legal regimes governing… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
The statement reads: We always strive to make the best, most informed decisions we can when we're compelled to reactively withhold identified content in specific jurisdictions around the world. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:42 pm
This was a unanimous decision – and written by Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
Franks is that public employers cannot successfully argue that, just because a public employee testifies about matters they learned as part of their official job responsibilities, the testimony lacks First Amendment protection as “official duties” speech. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:48 pm
Professional Confirmation of Little or no Risk of Future Sex Crime Conduct (Re-Offenses) 5. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
And Garcetti, a 5-4 decision, has been heavily criticized. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:19 pm
This publication is not a substitute for such legal advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
The case went to the Supreme Court, with argument on July 8, 1974, and a decision 16 days later. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Tom Corbett’s re-election bid – from casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, a blunder that appears to breach the state’s gaming act. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
The FDA quoted testimony from a government official – not a House or Senate report, or even the statement of any individual member of Congress – in support.We think that’s a bit of a stretch, for several reasons. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:27 pm
The document says,“The ban of influencing prospective employment prohibits any public official from making, participating in making, or influencing a governmental decision that directly relates to a prospective employer while negotiating or after reaching an employment arrangement. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:56 pm
We’re still working through all that. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:45 pm
That is, I’ve sought to trace how the absence of the profit motive became a defining feature of “the public. [read post]
