Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 9,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Kozlowski, 80 N.J. 378(1979); In re: Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381 (2002); Devaney v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:35 am
You’re probably thinking that there must be a lot of caselaw on this. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:18 am
“‘The judge remains free to modify it in the light of subsequent developments in the litigation,’” it wrote. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:15 am
Discretion is designed to produce varying results. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:44 am
So if you’re thinking about driving down to Chichen Itza this holiday, maybe take the bus. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
" was the question posed to the audience of "The African Fashion Design Industry: Capturing Value Through Intellectual Property", which Nicola chairing the surprisingly lively discussion, with fashion designers, IP specialists, and government representatives. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm
Drawing inspiration from well-known copyright and public domain works, as well as recent copyright litigation, the resource provides a springboard for exploring key principles and ideas underpinning copyright law and creativity, and the limits of lawful appropriation and re-use. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm
If you’re wondering, the motion judge didn’t define what he understood by the term “substantial connection”, which might be a good thing for the plaintiff. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:41 pm
For instance, I have used employers to help my students design appropriate Linkedin accounts. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
News notes that to term ISIS’s crimes a “genocide” would have greater implications than just wording, as the legal designation under a 1948 treaty requires countries take actions to “prevent and punish” the “‘odious scourge’ of genocide. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:54 am
Nope, we’re playing this one straight down the middle. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
So settle in, buckle up, hunker down, or do whatever it is that you do when you’re about to experience a serious glut of delicious Supreme Court flummery. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:03 am
The story brings to mind what I wrote in this post on the Microsoft case: If I’m reading the Magistrate Judge’s opinion correctly, you’re always interacting with Microsoft in the United States when you set up a Microsoft e-mail account. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
This is where a rights holder or creator releases their own content online, which is then aggregated by a third party, re-packaged and re-sold. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
Judge Leon wrote that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the law and that the program was “likely unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:37 pm
I know what you’re thinking: Who cares what happens with these two sets of records? [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:37 pm
Judges do not seem amused by the blanket insistence of many plan administrators that they have an absolute duty to recover the overpayment and an absolute right to recover the overpayment. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm
Q It sounds like you're saying it’s possible without -- MR. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:46 am
In civil personal injury lawsuit, a case dismissed without prejudice means that it can be re-filed at any time, as long as the plaintiff can show good cause for re-filing the case at that time. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:30 pm
First, the Public Domain status of case law means that whether the content is collected from court websites (like UC Berkeley’s Free Law Project) or scanned from case books (like Harvard’s Free the Law project), provided the copyrightable elements are stripped out, there are no lingering restrictions on use, re-use or further copying and distribution. [read post]
