Search for: "In Re Adoption of E"
Results 4641 - 4646
of 4,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2006, 5:18 am
"Finally, the Board refused to find that Applicant, although a licensee of Opposer's composite mark, adopted its mark in bad faith: "it appears to have been applicant's belief, however misguided, that opposer did not have any ownership rights to DARJEELING alone, and therefore no goodwill in the mark. [read post]
8 Aug 2006, 9:29 pm
So, with top U.N. officials calling for instant peace that would effectively equate "both sides" in the war launched out of Lebanon last month by Hezbollah against Israel, I e-mailed the U.N. [read post]
1 Jun 2006, 6:15 am
CLE-05-43115O R D E RThis matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by theCommission on Continuing Legal Education (“commission”) pursuant to Gov.BarR. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
Noting a split of authority in the decided cases on whether a filing in violation of 109(g) is void ab initio, Judge Isgur concluded instead that 362(b)(21) was adopted "with the apparent intent to legislatively overrule courts that were misapplying the statute as written. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
Noting a split of authority in the decided cases on whether a filing in violation of 109(g) is void ab initio, Judge Isgur concluded instead that 362(b)(21) was adopted "with the apparent intent to legislatively overrule courts that were misapplying the statute as written. [read post]
12 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
" In re Steelbuilding.com, 75 USPQ2d 1420 (Fed. [read post]
