Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 4641 - 4660 of 10,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Cody Poplin
But it has grown far less salient over the last few years, playing a much bigger role in the words of Al Qaeda and AQAP a few years ago than it does now—and playing a far lesser role in the propaganda of ISIS than it does in that of older terrorist groups. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Paul Bost
  The Board explained that determining whether a mark is generic involves a two-step inquiry:  (1) what is the genus of goods or services at issue, and (2) does the relevant public understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods and/or services. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:05 pm by Tom Smith
If he does have a dog, it isn't a labrador. 3) Biking is inherently dangerous. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm by Paul Bost
  The Board explained that determining whether a mark is generic involves a two-step inquiry:  (1) what is the genus of goods or services at issue, and (2) does the relevant public understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods and/or services. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:59 am
Both those cases concluded that the First Amendment true threats exception does require a showing of purpose to threaten. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Using HD for two reasons: (1) they bought it and the idea that they can use one kind of disc and not another is not intuitive; (2) you’re asking them to use lower quality or spend more money for worse footage. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Marty Lederman
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), held that under Article I, Section 2, total population is the only appropriate apportionment base for congressional apportionment. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:08 am by Jonathan Bailey
John Ullom, the founder of Citizen Access, said that he thought the video was owned by the city since it appeared on the city’s website. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
Moreover, the defendant asserts that the allegation that the child suffered "substantial pain" is uncorroborated hearsay and does not indicate that the child was injured as a result of his actions. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the defendant asserts that the allegation that the child suffered "substantial pain" is uncorroborated hearsay and does not indicate that the child was injured as a result of his actions. [read post]