Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 45,546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2022, 1:14 pm
” The bottom line is that an employer is prohibited from deducting an outstanding loan from an employee’s final paycheck. [read post]
31 May 2022, 1:10 pm
Background In that case, Monika Vakulchik v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
’ Only ‘financial information,’ rather than identities would be restricted in line with the implied undertaking. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am
“Replacement Theory” and the Genocide Worry In May 2022, a white supremacist with an assault rifle opened fire in a Tops Supermarket that served a predominantly Black neighbourhood of Buffalo, New York. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:20 am
I guess a number of SEP holders will take note of IP Bridge v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:51 am
In apparent reference to this line of cases, Seibel asserted in his answer an affirmative defense that the Court “lacks jurisdiction over the claims asserted in the Complaint. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” Cosme v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 4:10 pm
Indeed, TalkTalk sits within a longer line of authorities which are consistent on the point, including Morrisons, as well as, more recently Stadler v Currys Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 160 (QB) and Underwood & Underwood v Bounty UK Ltd & or [2022] EWHC 888 (QB) – the latter in particular being of note, given that the judgment was given by Nicklin J, the Judge in Charge of the Media and Communications List. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:25 am
” Meanwhile, the Ninth Circuit in Mattel v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during May 2022 Ten consistory court judgments were circulated in May, and those featured in this round-up relate to: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Privy Council Business, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
This case is the latest in a line of representative claims that have been withdrawn since the Supreme Court’s decision in Lloyd v Google, which determined that damages could only be awarded following individualised assessment, and were not available under the Data Protection Act 1998 merely for “loss of control” of personal data: proof of damage or distress was necessary. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm
In his view, this is best achieved through the established test in R v Collins, [1987] 1 SCR 265, 308. [read post]
29 May 2022, 7:41 am
A good example is the recent case out of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Wadley Crushed Stone Company, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 2:58 pm
In Bogle v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:19 am
The Case of Hughes v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 6:00 am
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 3:13 pm
The Court of Appeals determined in State v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
See Upsolve Inc. v. [read post]
